Selection Of A Pressure Vessel Manufacturer Essay

Selection Of A Pressure Vessel Manufacturer - Essay ExampleFurther to a greater extent the visit was to check the offer made in the proposals. This means that if nuclear products or Nuclear vessels quoted charge x, is that what it is going to be at the end, why is the price x, is there better Quality because of higher price, are they offering something more because of the price and so on. In short(p) , overtake the story behind the story. furthermore in terms of feasibility both were relatively feasible. Atomic products had a fixed price which was lesser to Nuclear vessels. However Nuclear vessels because of their variable cost they could end up to be cheaper then Atomic products. Further feasibility factors are discussed later in the answer.The second factor was to weigh the pros and cons of the two short listed suppliers. Even though this is discussed in detail in answer 3 and four, but in eye the discovery was that both of them were in comparison better in one field and rela tively worsened of in the other field.The fourth factor was to discover the story behind the story. In essence they did discover the story behind the story. The detailed answer is in question 4, but the abbreviation of it would be that in nature, motivation and cooperation which play an essential part in any fellowship even though on paper (proposal) one seems to be better. Furthermore a product is not good if it is cheap and of badly quality. Likewise guarantee is no good if the product does not meet specifications. In the end one ends up with no product with a period of time lost.The fifth factor was to evaluate whether the flock of Oceanics Company would materialize if the task was given to Atomic products or Nuclear vessels. This factor would be highly dependent on the perception of the Oceanics representative. As the case speaks that after the proposal and after the two visits jack Tooles, the representative of Oceanics Company was in split between the two companies. There fore the vision that Oceanics Company has, is relevant to both companies. thence this completes the evaluation for both companies.3. Based on the face value of the written proposals, which company appeared to submit the better offerwhich is betterProposal PointATOMIC PRODUCTSNUCLEAR VESSELSPrice.(estimated costs)xPrice.(variable costs)Hence resultant lower costsxShop facilitiesxxPast experiencexNeed for SubcontractingxOrganization.xxDelivery.xxGuaranteexAs the summary shows